Jump to content


Update 1.14.1 - Chinese Vehicles Rebalancing

Update 1.14.1 Common Test

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

Dwigt #1 Posted 05 October 2021 - 12:15 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • WG Staff
  • 2477 battles
  • 1,455
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-29-2018

Hello Tankers,

 

Please feel free to share your feedback on the Chinese vehicles rebalancing here!

 

More info on the changes:

Spoiler

 

Thanks!



Killboy2_N #2 Posted 12 October 2021 - 05:11 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 42567 battles
  • 25
  • Member since:
    07-18-2014
Tier 9 is unplayable with -3 gun depression. Make it -5. And give Chrysler more standard penetration wtf

ld86 #3 Posted 12 October 2021 - 09:57 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 25025 battles
  • 28
  • [-UXT-] -UXT-
  • Member since:
    09-14-2013

View PostKillboy2_N, on 12 October 2021 - 04:11 AM, said:

Tier 9 is unplayable with -3 gun depression. Make it -5. And give Chrysler more standard penetration wtf

there must be a downside to the strong turret armor and 440 dmg

and the chrysler is strong enough as well imo...



Feoffle_der_Fachidiot #4 Posted 12 October 2021 - 10:10 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 20186 battles
  • 305
  • [MEME] MEME
  • Member since:
    05-24-2015
The buffs to the WZ-120 have made absolutely no discernible difference to the gameplay, whatsover.

Veka26 #5 Posted 13 October 2021 - 10:09 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 61191 battles
  • 120
  • [KRUL] KRUL
  • Member since:
    02-02-2014

View Postld86, on 12 October 2021 - 08:57 AM, said:

there must be a downside to the strong turret armor and 440 dmg

and the chrysler is strong enough as well imo...

Wz-120 had plenty of downsides before the last couple rounds of "buffs". It had worse armor and mobility than T-54 (which is based on shares its armor layout). It had horrible aimtime and gun handling in general.

The issue here is that it got buffed in a backwards way, buffing DPM, which was never an issue, it had decent DPM for its pen and alpha. Top speed buff is meaningless too as it still has mediocre P/W.

They only had to buff depression to 5 degrees and aimtime to the current state IMO, and than see if it actually makes it OP or just playable, instead of this ridiculous backwards/roundabout buffs to secondary issues of the tank.

Also the 440 alpha is not that scary and special as it was in 2014 when I first played it, it got powercrept by the PTAs 420 alpha and also various T8 premium/reward tanks...



Feoffle_der_Fachidiot #6 Posted 13 October 2021 - 12:51 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 20186 battles
  • 305
  • [MEME] MEME
  • Member since:
    05-24-2015

View PostFeoffle_der_Fachidiot, on 12 October 2021 - 10:10 AM, said:

The buffs to the WZ-120 have made absolutely no discernible difference to the gameplay, whatsover.

 

So apparently I made this statement before the buffs went live, so my opinion is completely irrelevant and would explain why I couldn't see any difference. #3head.



Rosetta_and_Philae #7 Posted 15 October 2021 - 02:29 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 60317 battles
  • 2,289
  • [WTF-X] WTF-X
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011
As far as the 110 is concerned the aim time and dispersion buffs were warranted and badly needed but the other buffs are hardly noticeable.  Side armour buff would have been good.  This vehicle is most certainly not a break through heavy tank but more of a support at best.  More buffs definitely needed.;)





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users