Jump to content


Mission not completed because of reasons.

Russian numbers

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
35 replies to this topic

MeetriX #21 Posted 13 October 2021 - 07:34 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38651 battles
  • 7,126
  • [_ACE] _ACE
  • Member since:
    08-12-2012

View PostHomer_J, on 13 October 2021 - 06:30 AM, said:

Or, as I said, they use what I have discovered is called "modified competition ranking" or 1334 ranking.  But is the way I've always known ranking done since my school days.  I dunno, maybe it's a Yorkshire thing.

04:33 Added after 3 minute

Actually, it's in the wording.

 

Be among the top 5

 

If there are four higher and one equal then you are among the top 6, not the top 5.

It is a Yorkshire thing.

Maybe also a Belarussian thing, because in there, there can be only one.

In every sports you start counting from the top.

1, 2, 3, 3, 5, 5, 7.

1, 1, 3, 4, 5.

 

Example Olympic boxing there are 2 bronze medalist, not 2 bubble boys.

 

 



Orkbert #22 Posted 13 October 2021 - 12:08 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 33222 battles
  • 3,250
  • [ASSO] ASSO
  • Member since:
    08-29-2013

View PostMeetriX, on 13 October 2021 - 07:34 AM, said:

It is a Yorkshire thing.

Maybe also a Belarussian thing, because in there, there can be only one.

In every sports you start counting from the top.

1, 2, 3, 3, 5, 5, 7.

1, 1, 3, 4, 5.

 

Example Olympic boxing there are 2 bronze medalist, not 2 bubble boys.

 

 

 

It might be a bit hard for you to accept, but how other stuff does their ranking might be totally irrelevant.

 

The game had decided that you had not fulfilled the criteria to complete the mission, and we gave you plenty of reasons why you did not rank high enough to pass. And so far you have not refuted any of our reasoning, you just keep coming up with stuff not related to this game.



MeetriX #23 Posted 13 October 2021 - 12:53 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38651 battles
  • 7,126
  • [_ACE] _ACE
  • Member since:
    08-12-2012

View PostOrkbert, on 13 October 2021 - 01:08 PM, said:

 

It might be a bit hard for you to accept, but how other stuff does their ranking might be totally irrelevant.

 

The game had decided that you had not fulfilled the criteria to complete the mission, and we gave you plenty of reasons why you did not rank high enough to pass. And so far you have not refuted any of our reasoning, you just keep coming up with stuff not related to this game.

I won and was 5th in damage. Criterias fulfilled. Mission not completed. <-- Obvious conflict.

You have not gave reasons, only guesses.

Game ranked me 5th place, because I was 5th. You can see it in the screenshot or maybe not. I have no idea how good your eyesight is.

 

If I would had done less damage than I did, then I would be in 6th place.

What stuff you brought that is related to this game?

All you have done is babling about Xp which is completely irrelevat in this case or do you have an actual proofs why I did not complete that mission and why the game still ranked me on the 5th place?

 

I said earlier that I did 0,05 more damage than the E 100. That is why I am 5th place.

 

 


Edited by MeetriX, 13 October 2021 - 09:20 PM.


Marco_Is_Legend2019 #24 Posted 13 October 2021 - 01:11 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 333 battles
  • 1,793
  • Member since:
    02-17-2019
Hey Meetrix, why don't you do us a favour and ask support about it. Because obviously we're just guessing here but no one seem to have a definitive answer. Attach the replay to a ticket and be a pest until you get a satisfactory answer. It'll help you, others and it'll cut the horseplay.

Homer_J #25 Posted 13 October 2021 - 01:51 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Moderator
  • 35868 battles
  • 40,671
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostMeetriX, on 13 October 2021 - 12:53 PM, said:

I won and was 5th in damage. 

 

 

Regardless of how you define 5th place you were not in the top 5 players by damage, you were in the top 6.

 

It does not say top 5 places, it says top 5 players.



MeetriX #26 Posted 13 October 2021 - 01:57 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38651 battles
  • 7,126
  • [_ACE] _ACE
  • Member since:
    08-12-2012

View PostHomer_J, on 13 October 2021 - 02:51 PM, said:

 

Regardless of how you define 5th place you were not in the top 5 players by damage, you were in the top 6.

 

It does not say top 5 places, it says top 5 players.

I was top 5, shared place. There was no 6th at all. The next one was 7th.

So the most reasonable explanation is what I already expected.

Belarussians don't play by the rules.

12:59 Added after 1 minute

View PostMarco_Is_Legend2019, on 13 October 2021 - 02:11 PM, said:

Hey Meetrix, why don't you do us a favour and ask support about it. Because obviously we're just guessing here but no one seem to have a definitive answer. Attach the replay to a ticket and be a pest until you get a satisfactory answer. It'll help you, others and it'll cut the horseplay.


Not a bad suggestion, but we are talking about WG support. :sceptic:



CandyVanMan #27 Posted 14 October 2021 - 09:51 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32866 battles
  • 1,943
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    05-15-2011
You are quite literally in top 6, as you shared the same damage number as another guy, so you are technically not in the top 5, neither of you are.

Homer_J #28 Posted 14 October 2021 - 11:27 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Moderator
  • 35868 battles
  • 40,671
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostMeetriX, on 13 October 2021 - 01:57 PM, said:

I was top 5, shared place. There was no 6th at all. The next one was 7th.

 

 

So you are saying there were 6 players in the top 5?

 

Errmm....  6 didn't go into 5 when I was at school.  Admittedly a lot's changed since then but.....



MeetriX #29 Posted 14 October 2021 - 12:07 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38651 battles
  • 7,126
  • [_ACE] _ACE
  • Member since:
    08-12-2012

View PostHomer_J, on 14 October 2021 - 12:27 PM, said:

 

So you are saying there were 6 players in the top 5?

 

Errmm....  6 didn't go into 5 when I was at school.  Admittedly a lot's changed since then but.....

If 6 players do 1000dmg each. Then there is 6 top-1 players, but no 2-6. The next best will be 7.



CandyVanMan #30 Posted 14 October 2021 - 12:28 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32866 battles
  • 1,943
  • [KAZNA] KAZNA
  • Member since:
    05-15-2011

View PostMeetriX, on 14 October 2021 - 11:07 AM, said:

If 6 players do 1000dmg each. Then there is 6 top-1 players, but no 2-6. The next best will be 7.

 

No, there is no top 1, only top 6.

A draw is not a win, it's just a loss for everyone, same here.

Everyone is a loser, nobody won.



Gruff_ #31 Posted 14 October 2021 - 01:37 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 29035 battles
  • 4,096
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    09-22-2011

Better luck next time.



Homer_J #32 Posted 14 October 2021 - 02:53 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Moderator
  • 35868 battles
  • 40,671
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostMeetriX, on 14 October 2021 - 12:07 PM, said:

If 6 players do 1000dmg each. Then there is 6 top-1 players, but no 2-6. The next best will be 7.

 

None of the top six are in the top 5.

 

That's irrespective of what position you give them, joint 1st or joint 6th.



MeetriX #33 Posted 14 October 2021 - 03:20 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38651 battles
  • 7,126
  • [_ACE] _ACE
  • Member since:
    08-12-2012

View PostHomer_J, on 14 October 2021 - 03:53 PM, said:

 

None of the top six are in the top 5.

 

That's irrespective of what position you give them, joint 1st or joint 6th.

In any competitions there has to be a at least one winner.

 



Homer_J #34 Posted 15 October 2021 - 11:48 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Moderator
  • 35868 battles
  • 40,671
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostMeetriX, on 14 October 2021 - 03:20 PM, said:

In any competitions there has to be a at least one winner.

 

 

Again you are confusing positions with players.

 

The top 6 players cannot be the top 5 players.  It's simply not possible.


Edited by Homer_J, 15 October 2021 - 11:49 AM.


MeetriX #35 Posted 15 October 2021 - 12:39 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38651 battles
  • 7,126
  • [_ACE] _ACE
  • Member since:
    08-12-2012
Just close this debate!

Homer_J #36 Posted 17 October 2021 - 08:56 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Moderator
  • 35868 battles
  • 40,671
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010
As requested.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users