Main page

 RainbowDash_GER, on 21 January 2012 - 03:55 PM, said:

Average destroyed in the battle
Average damage in the battle
Both these characteristics depends on tank model and  Tank tier.
That causes subjectivity/inaccuracy of eficiency rating.

1680.12

Went down about 20 points after I started playing with low tier french tanks.

This has 1 flaw though, if you play arty often your "scouted per battle" score will be crap and it will bring down your efficiency score by quite a bit.

good site. Mine is 1195.45 :~(

Nice to see someone doing stats that tbh WG should be doing

 Leyanire, on 21 January 2012 - 06:53 PM, said:

Nonsense. Everyone gets the same teams.

 tramazi, on 21 January 2012 - 07:44 PM, said:

Actually for reasons already mentioned these stats are pretty much worthless  

992,44

I approve of that site.

 HendrikZ, on 21 January 2012 - 07:59 PM, said:

Harsh judgement. I find it hard to believe that I could be anywhere near Emu's level, and yes, I base that on these stats solely, I have never seen him play.
Deceiving to some point (and just to some point), yes, but worthless? I am sorry but I find that nonsense.

1271.02

As expected... I am pretty much an above average player.

1276.89

Hmm... didn't expect to be that efficient.

1748


So close yet so far from unique

Efficiency rating
1527.59

Could be worse, I guess. Certainly higher then I hoped for.

 HendrikZ, on 21 January 2012 - 07:59 PM, said:

How so? All the variables are things that would reflect general skill. Especially since they can represent different types of play (one is spotting, another is damage). The only potentially "worthless" variable here as far as I can tell, is the "Average destroyed in the battle" one.

1662.87

If I would defend as much as I attack it would've been a crazy efficiency rating, but I guess I just don't like sitting at home, waiting for people to come along and start capping

Just out of interest I tested against the top ten (Ave Exp) from the hall of fame:

Average Experience per Battle (Wot Hall of Fame) name score
1 LiannaSilverwind 2646.45
3 emu87 2621.76
9 Straik 2612.89
2 PostimiesPate 2325.74
10 PaR0v0zz_DJAN 2205.45
5 Bullkin 2193.66
4 apheex 1946.78
7 MakaronXxX 1870.64
6 XeoN_ 1663.59
8 Atreus_ 1457.62

 RustyGalloway, on 21 January 2012 - 08:20 PM, said:

exactly, and avg. destroyed in battle could represent the ability to "finish the job". Naturaly you could have 5:1 kill ratio, but that would mean you are a kill stealer and so your other stats will suffer and overall effectiveness will drop.

 Doolio, on 21 January 2012 - 08:06 PM, said:

From his stats he looks like a very good player but the main reason for his high rating is the high amount of games played with high tier meds/heavies as these are what is extremly favored by this kind of measurement.

Also you should think of the low amount of samples the average player has. 2-3k samples isnt nearly enough to outweight the high amount of randoms wot has to offer.

Some stuff to think about :
-matchmaking for tier 5-7 is screwed giving people who have large amounts of games in tier 8-10 a big advantage in these stats
-players focusing mainly on arty will have low cap/defend points and nearly zero spotted giving them a huge disatvantage.(this again favors meds/heavy)
-the state a tank is in, most players will have alot more games with non-elite tanks than with elite tanks
-gold... skipping stock tanks, skipping bad tanks, getting faster to tier 8+ meaning less screwed mm.

 tramazi, on 21 January 2012 - 08:22 PM, said:

Yeah, 2000 games in your VK3601(H) with gold shells in your Gun 7,5 cm KwK 41 L/58 konisch cannon will give you that kind of efficiency
Only speaking for Lianna of course

1185.

I'm clearly not a team player hehe

 HendrikZ, on 21 January 2012 - 08:29 PM, said:

I totally see your point.

But this pretty much renders any "simple" statistics "worthless". No readily available statistics will take these aspects into account. Based on what we can get from battle statistics as things are now, my opinion is that this efficiency calculator gives us the best possible representation of player skill.