deveen23, on 24 February 2012 - 04:58 PM, said:
And I bet Bagger 255 would do really well on the battlefield.
if its possible to built a 5900 ton vehicle in 1955 its possible to built a 1000 ton vehicle in 1945, and tanks (of that time) are ANYTHING harder to construct then a tank, a tank of that size (and of that time) wouldnt need/have any kind of stabilizer, infrared, advanced aiming device or whatever, its just a big bad-ass ``thing`` of steel (like the bagger) with some armor attached to it, and 2 battleship guns.
vs other tanks, bunkers and ground forces the Ratte would be total bad-ass, nothing would be able to stop it, yet vs arty and aicraft, the Ratte is toast.
and 1000 T34 might get owned by a Ratte, but 200 KT`s would also own those 1000 T34, and 300 or 400 Panthers would also own those 1000 T34, the cost of 1 Ratte would be far, far to high, to make it worth the afford.